The Human Intelligence Problem
1.1 The Growing Need for Human Validation
As artificial intelligence becomes ubiquitous, the need for human validation paradoxically increases:
Content Moderation at Scale
- Social platforms process billions of posts requiring contextual judgment
- AI struggles with sarcasm, cultural nuance, and evolving language patterns
- Human reviewers provide essential subjective assessment capabilities
AI Training and Verification
- Large language models require human feedback for alignment and safety
- Creative AI outputs need human evaluation for quality and appropriateness
- Automated systems need human oversight for ethical compliance
Complex Decision Making
- Strategic business decisions require human intuition and experience
- Legal interpretations need contextual understanding beyond algorithmic capability
- Creative and artistic evaluation demands subjective human judgment
Blockchain Oracle Limitations
- Current oracles excel at objective data (prices, weather, sports scores)
- Subjective validation remains largely unsolved at blockchain scale
- Growing DeFi and DAO ecosystems need human consensus for complex disputes
1.2 Current Solution Inadequacies
Traditional Consulting
- Centralized, expensive, limited scalability
- Geographic and time zone constraints
- High overhead costs and lengthy engagement processes
- Race-to-the-bottom pricing structures
- No reputation or quality assurance systems
- Limited integration with blockchain and Web3 ecosystems
Existing Play-to-Earn Models
- Unsustainable inflationary tokenomics
- Ponzi-like economics dependent on new player capital
- Limited real-world utility beyond speculation
Previous: ← Executive Summary
Next: Solution Overview →